Citations (3)


Footnotes (197)



Privacy, Property, and Public Sex

Carlos A. Ball

Rutgers Law School

This Article argues that the constitutional right to sexual liberty should include the right to engage in public sex under certain circumstances. In doing so, the Article contends that the right to sexual liberty should not, as the Supreme Court has held, be site-dependent, that is, its scope should not be limited to sexual conduct that takes place in the home and other private places. The Article reviews the sociological literature on public sex to explain how sexual actors frequently and effectively privatize public sex sites. By analogizing to the privacy protection afforded by the Fourth Amendment, the Article argues that what should ultimately matter in determining the scope of the right to sexual liberty under the Due Process Clause is not where the sex takes place but whether the sexual actors' expectations of privacy are reasonable. In the end, the Article seeks to problematize the seemingly intuitive notion that, in matters of sex and sexuality, the concept of privacy is inextricably linked to geographic sites that are private.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: Privacy, Due Process, Sexual Liberty, Right to Exclude

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2008 ; Last revised: March 10, 2008

Suggested Citation

Ball, Carlos A., Privacy, Property, and Public Sex. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091526 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1091526

Contact Information

Carlos A. Ball (Contact Author)
Rutgers Law School ( email )
123 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102
United States
973-353-3008 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,840
Downloads: 197
Download Rank: 107,063
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  197

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds