Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091809
 
 

Footnotes (46)



 


 



Reliability Lost, False Confessions Discovered


Mark Godsey


University of Cincinnati College of Law

2007

Chapman Law Review, Vol. 10, p. 623, 2007
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 08-02

Abstract:     
The advent of post-conviction DNA testing in the past twenty years has spawned an Innocence Revolution, in which hundreds of Americans imprisoned or on death row for serious crimes like murder and rape have been conclusively proven innocent and released. From studying the cases of wrongful convictions, we now know that eyewitness identification is not nearly as reliable as once believed. We also know that hundreds of innocent people have been convicted through the use of junk science. such as bite mark analysis or microscopic hair comparison, which DNA testing has proven to be wildly inaccurate. Most importantly for my purposes here, we now know that suspects will confess all too often to crimes that they did not commit, leading to wrongful convictions. Of all the things that DNA has taught us about our criminal justice system, this phenomenon is perhaps the hardest to accept. The idea that a suspect would falsely confess to a crime that he did not commit seems counterintuitive and nonsensical.

For centuries, constitutional confession law in the United States has been concerned with the reliability and accuracy of confessions. Prior to admission into evidence, a court in this country had to examine whether the confession at issue was accurate and trustworthy. In the 1986 case of Colorado v. Connelly, however, the United States Supreme Court suddenly subverted reliability as a factor when considering the admissibility of a confession. Then, ironically, shortly after Connelly was decided, DNA testing started to reveal why we should be very concerned about the reliability of confessions after all. Indeed, within a decade of the Connelly decision, the false confession problem in this country had been laid bare. In this essay, taken from my talk at a symposium held by the Chapman Law Review, I attempt to shed light on this legal irony.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Wrongful convictions, false confessions, DNA

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 12, 2008 ; Last revised: August 6, 2009

Suggested Citation

Godsey, Mark, Reliability Lost, False Confessions Discovered (2007). Chapman Law Review, Vol. 10, p. 623, 2007; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 08-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091809

Contact Information

Mark Godsey (Contact Author)
University of Cincinnati College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,806
Downloads: 148
Download Rank: 111,478
Footnotes:  46

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds