|
||||
|
||||
Relational Duties, Regulatory Duties, and the Widening Gap between Individual Health Law and Collective Health Policy
William M. Sage University of Texas at Austin School of Law Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 96, No. 2, 2008 U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 133 Abstract: In response to a prominent editorial by Dr. Jeffrey M. Drazen, Professor Sage explains how a relational approach has impeded health law's ability to effectively govern the American health care system, arguing that health law has traditionally focused on the physician-patient encounter rather than on achieving collective objectives (which he calls regulatory duties). Professor Sage traces health law's relational emphasis to private and public law, professional ethics and bioethics, budgetary and general politics, and health care consumerism. He concludes that four areas of health policy-conflicts of interest in biomedical research, managed care and pay-for-performance, health care transparency and education, and public health-require a more collective regulatory commitment.
Keywords: health law, public law, bioethics, policy, biomedical JEL Classifications: I10, I18, Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 11, 2008 ; Last revised: February 15, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo7 in 0.140 seconds.