Footnotes (236)



Could and Should America Have Made an Ottoman Republic in 1919

Paul D. Carrington

Duke University School of Law

William & Mary Law Review, 2008
Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 187

This essay will be published in the William & Mary Law Review in 2008. Numerous Americans, perhaps especially American lawyers, have since the 1780s presumed to tell other peoples how to govern themselves. In 2006, that persistent impulse was once again echoed in an address to the American Bar Association by a Justice of the Supreme Court. The purpose of this essay is to question the wisdom of this evangelical ambition, especially when the form of instruction includes military force. It is draws on Spreading America's Word (2005) and directs attention to the hopes of American Protestant Zionists to make a democratic republic in Ottoman Palestine. It suggests that chances were better in 1919 than they are in 2008, but were none to good at that time. It rejects the appeal of the militant "neo-conservatives" who expressed their hopes and expectations in The Project for A New American Century, an instrument that should be read and remembered for centuries to come.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 15, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Carrington, Paul D., Could and Should America Have Made an Ottoman Republic in 1919. William & Mary Law Review, 2008; Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 187. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1092588

Contact Information

Paul D. Carrington (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7040 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 670
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 192,921
Footnotes:  236

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.922 seconds