Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1093307
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (258)



 


 



State Innovation and Preemption: Lessons from State Climate Change Efforts


Alexandra B. Klass


University of Minnesota Law School


Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review,, Vol. 42, p. 1653, 2008
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-07

Abstract:     
In cases involving both express and implied preemption, the Supreme Court and lower courts have applied a "presumption against preemption" to preserve state law in areas of "traditional state concern." In the decades since Congress first enacted major health, safety, and environmental legislation, federal agencies in the public health and environmental areas have created massive federal regulatory programs to fulfill Congressional directives. As a result of these agency developments, courts and scholars are forced to consider not only the original Congressional language relevant to preemption, but also subsequent actions taken by federal agencies to implement Congressional mandates to determine whether there are exclusive federal interests that may preempt traditional state authority. Based on a study of recent state efforts to control greenhouse gas emissions, I suggest that in cases where Congress has expressed an intent to preserve state law in the federal regulatory framework governing areas of "traditional state concern," such intent should be construed not only to preserve state law in its current form but also to act as an implied delegation to states to fulfill federal as well as state policy goals going forward. Under such an approach, where states have pursued new and innovative approaches to implement Congressional goals, such efforts should serve to counterbalance any federal agency efforts to carve out areas of exclusive federal interest to preempt state law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: federal preemption, state law, federalism, climate change, global warming, environmental law, air pollution, supremacy clause, agency action, EPA, FDA

JEL Classification: K13, K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 15, 2008 ; Last revised: June 2, 2013

Suggested Citation

Klass, Alexandra B., State Innovation and Preemption: Lessons from State Climate Change Efforts. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review,, Vol. 42, p. 1653, 2008; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-07. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1093307

Contact Information

Alexandra B. Klass (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-625-0155 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,310
Downloads: 199
Download Rank: 84,633
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  258

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds