Abstract

 
 

References (28)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



False Discoveries: Winners and Losers in Mutual Fund Performance


Keith Cuthbertson


City University London - Sir John Cass Business School

Dirk Nitzsche


City University London - Sir John Cass Business School

Niall O'Sullivan


University College Cork, Ireland.

January 2008


Abstract:     
We use a multiple hypothesis testing framework to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR) amongst UK equity mutual funds. For all funds, we find a relatively high FDR for the best funds of 67% (at a 10% significance level), which indicates that only around 2% of all funds truly outperform their benchmarks. For the worst funds the FDR (at a 10% significance level), is relatively small at 15.9% which results in 20% of funds which truly underperform their benchmarks. For different investment styles, this pattern of very few genuine winner funds is repeated for all companies, small companies and equity income funds. However, forming portfolios of funds based on a set of funds for which the FDR is relatively low, produces positive alphas.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Mutual fund performance, false discovery rate

JEL Classification: C15, G11, C14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 15, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Cuthbertson, Keith, Nitzsche, Dirk and O'Sullivan, Niall , False Discoveries: Winners and Losers in Mutual Fund Performance (January 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1093624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1093624

Contact Information

Keith Cuthbertson (Contact Author)
City University London - Sir John Cass Business School ( email )
106 Bunhill Row
London, EC1Y 8TZ
United Kingdom
Dirk Nitzsche
City University London - Sir John Cass Business School ( email )
106 Bunhill Row
London, EC1Y 8TZ
United Kingdom
Niall O'Sullivan
University College Cork, Ireland. ( email )
College Road
Cork
Ireland
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,670
Downloads: 466
Download Rank: 28,291
References:  28
Citations:  2

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.687 seconds