Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1094304
 
 

Footnotes (76)



 


 



eBay Rx


Tracy A. Thomas


University of Akron School of Law


Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2, No. 187, 2008
U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-01

Abstract:     
From a remedial perspective, the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C reopened the age-old question of what it means to award equitable relief. In eBay, the Court rejected a permanent injunction issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to protect a business-method patent that defendant eBay had infringed on its successful auction website. This essay diagnoses the remedial problem in eBay as the improper use of presumptions for equitable relief that effectively prioritizes selected legal rights. It offers a prescriptive cure for the problem in the traditional balancing of the equities standard that emphasizes the respective equities of the private parties, including their economic motivations and inequitable conduct. This signifies a return to the historical notion of equity as a legal accommodation of private and public interests in pursuit of justice.

This essay was written as part of the Akron Intellectual Property Scholars Roundtable and its conference exploring the legal implications of the eBay case.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: injunctions, remedies, patents, equity

JEL Classification: K1

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 17, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Thomas, Tracy A., eBay Rx. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2, No. 187, 2008; U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1094304

Contact Information

Tracy A. Thomas (Contact Author)
University of Akron School of Law ( email )
150 University Ave.
Akron, OH 44325-2901
United States
330-972-6617 (Phone)
330-258-2343 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 578
Downloads: 63
Download Rank: 211,446
Footnotes:  76
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds