Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095045
 
 

Footnotes (46)



 


 



Video Evidence and Summary Judgment: The Procedure of Scott v. Harris


Howard M. Wasserman


Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law


JUDICATURE, Vol. 91, No. 180, January/February 2008

Abstract:     
In Scott v. Harris (2007), the Supreme Court granted summary judgment on a Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim brought by a motorist injured when a pursuing law-enforcement officer terminated a high-speed pursuit by bumping the plaintiff's car. The Court relied almost exclusively on a video of the chase captured from the officer's dash-mounted camera and disregarded witness testimony that contradicted the video. In granting summary judgment in this circumstance, the Court fell sway to the myth of video evidence as able to speak for itself, as an objective, unambiguous, and singularly accurate depiction of real-world events, not subject to any interpretation or subjective analysis. For the majority, there was no need for a fact-finder to review the video or to compare the video with the competing testimony of eyewitnesses, because what the majority saw in the video was true. The reality, however, is that video evidence is not so singularly objective or definitive in its meaning and message; instead, video presents one perspective on events and is subject to the interpretation and close analysis reserved for the jury at trial. This essay critiques the Court's approach in Scott, both the immediate decision and with an eye on the increasing use of video recording of encounters between police and the likelihood that video will be an increasingly common element of civil rights litigation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Civil Rights, Fourth Amendment, procedure, summary judgment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 19, 2008 ; Last revised: October 24, 2008

Suggested Citation

Wasserman, Howard M., Video Evidence and Summary Judgment: The Procedure of Scott v. Harris. JUDICATURE, Vol. 91, No. 180, January/February 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095045

Contact Information

Howard M. Wasserman (Contact Author)
Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )
University Park, DB 2065
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-7482 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,148
Downloads: 168
Download Rank: 102,971
Footnotes:  46

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.547 seconds