Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095352
 
 

Footnotes (194)



 


 



Mandatory Rules


Scott Dodson


University of California Hastings College of the Law

2008

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 1, 2008

Abstract:     
Whether a limitation is jurisdictional or not is an important but often obscure question. In an Article in Northwestern University Law Review, I proposed a framework for courts to resolve the issue in a principled way, but I left open the next logical question: what does it mean if a rule is characterized as nonjurisdictional? Jurisdictional rules generally have a clearly defined set of traits: they are not subject to equitable exceptions, consent, waiver, or forfeiture; they can be raised at any time; and they can be raised by any party or the court sua sponte. This jurisdictional rigidity has led courts and commentators to overlook the fact that nonjurisdictional rules need not be the mirror inverse but may instead have some of these attributes of jurisdictionality. A nonjurisdictional rule might, for example, be mandatory, meaning that it is subject to waiver or forfeiture, but if properly raised by the party for whose benefit it lies, it has the jurisdictional-like attribute of being immune to equitable exceptions. This Article is the first to take a hard look at nonjurisdictional rules and, particularly, mandatory rules. It first argues that they have an important normative role to play in our procedural system. It then shows that, in practice, mandatory but nonjurisdictional characterizations may help explain a number of perplexing doctrines. As an example, the Article demonstrates how such a characterization can help reconcile the otherwise maddeningly inconsistent doctrine of state sovereign immunity. Ultimately, the Article suggests that a greater appreciation for mandatory rules both can benefit the procedural system and can broaden our view of what salutary roles nonjurisdictional rules can play.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: jurisdicitonality, mandatory rule, jurisdiction, sovereign immunity, time to appeal

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2008 ; Last revised: November 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dodson, Scott, Mandatory Rules (2008). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095352

Contact Information

Scott Dodson (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-581-8959 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://https://www.uchastings.edu/faculty-administration/faculty/dodson/index.html

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,586
Downloads: 250
Download Rank: 66,934
Footnotes:  194

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds