Footnotes (16)



12 Angry Men: A Revisionist View

Michael Asimow

Stanford Law School

Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 711, 2007
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 08-03

12 Angry Men is the iconic jury film but this article contends that it should not be viewed as a tribute to the jury system. Quite the contrary, the jury in the film erred badly by acquitting the defendant, even though the probability that he killed his father approaches 100%. The circumstantial evidence against him was overwhelming. Even if all of the eye witness testimony is discredited, the circumstantial evidence is far more than enough to satisfy the reasonable doubt standard.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Asimow, Michael, 12 Angry Men: A Revisionist View. Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 711, 2007; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 08-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095488

Contact Information

Michael R. Asimow (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Room 241
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-2431 (Phone)
650-725-0253 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,984
Downloads: 357
Download Rank: 61,312
Footnotes:  16

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.375 seconds