Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095838
 


 



Sanctioning Law Firms for Lawyers' Frivolous Filings


Jeffrey A. Parness


Northern Illinois University - College of Law

February 20, 2008

Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 95, p. 490, 2007

Abstract:     
In Medical Alliances, LLC v. Health Care Service Corp., 863 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. 2d 2007), the court ruled that a law firm could not be sanctioned under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137 for the filing of a frivolous pleading by a law firm member. The split among Illinois appellate courts on the issue continues. Unlike Rule 137, law firms can definitely be sanctioned under Federal Civil Procedure Rule11. Illinois judicial rulemakers should now allow law firm sanctions thorugh amendments to Rule 137, itself added and modeled in 1989 on the 1983 amendments to Rule 11. In the absence of Rule 187 authority, inherent sanctioning power is available against law firms for pleading and other civil litigation misconduct in the Illinois circuit courts.

Keywords: Rule 11, Rule 137, law firm sanctions, civil procedure, frivolous pleading

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Parness, Jeffrey A., Sanctioning Law Firms for Lawyers' Frivolous Filings (February 20, 2008). Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 95, p. 490, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095838

Contact Information

Jeffrey A. Parness (Contact Author)
Northern Illinois University - College of Law ( email )
Swen Parson Hall
DeKalb, IL 60115
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 535
Downloads: 27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.204 seconds