Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095884
 
 

Footnotes (95)



 


 



An Empirical Evaluation of Long Term Advisors and Short Term Interventions in Technical Assistance and Capacity Building


D. Daniel Sokol


University of Florida - Levin College of Law; George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center

Kyle W. Stiegert


University of Wisconsin


U. of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-03
College of Europe GCLC Working Paper No. 02/08

Abstract:     
Technical assistance to improve the capacity of regulatory agencies around the world remains a key priority for international aid efforts. Technical assistance is critical to younger antitrust agencies because more effective agencies can protect consumers against anti-competitive conduct. Beginning in the 1990s, the rapid adoption of antitrust laws and development of agencies to interpret and enforce these laws has transformed the competitive landscape in many countries. Indeed, more than half of the countries with an antitrust legal framework enacted antitrust laws in the past 15 years. Many of the newer antitrust agencies are not as effective as they need to be to improve the well being of consumers and protect against anti-competitive conduct. Consequently, donors have assigned a significant amount of time and financial resources to technical assistance to raise the capacity and effectiveness of these younger agencies. However, quantitative analysis of the impact of this technical assistance remains limited at best. In a previous paper, we undertook a general analysis of antitrust technical assistance. In this paper we focus on what appears to be a particularly important part of technical assistance and capacity building - the use of long term advisors (LTA) and short term interventions (STI).

In 2005, the International Competition Network conducted a survey of antitrust agencies that received LTA and STI services from a wide array of donor agencies. We first perform a descriptive assessment of the survey data. We find LTAs to be more effective than STIs in preparing the agency for tackling work they could not have undertaken previously and in confronting cartels. Most LTA and STI services arrived directly from developed world antitrust agencies and lawyers were superior to economists for STI work while economists tend to perform best as LTAs. In a more general empirical framework, we model the effectiveness of LTA and STI interventions using key survey questions about the initial preparation phase, the ability of the interventions to improve internal tactical qualities of the agency, and the ability of the interventions to improve the agency in its strategic mission. We estimate a three equation seemingly unrelated regression system designed to tease out the factors that led to a successful preparation of tactical and strategic technical assistance. The most important findings are related to two structural features of recipient antitrust agencies. Our most prominent finding is that recipient agencies absorb LTA and STI services best when the agency head has a rank of minister or higher and/or when agencies had prosecutorial discretion. At the heart of these agency features is the relative power position of the agency in the domestic political and economic structure. Those agencies with a strong power base seem well positioned to receive the current formatted technical assistance involving LTAs and STIs. Donors should focus on modifying the technical assistance to agencies with less power and should push for stronger agency autonomy and authority. A second prominent finding was that bilateral donor relationships did remarkably better in helping the agencies with their strategic mission. Perhaps bilateral LTA and STI perform better because of a better understanding of the political and economic realities these agencies face or because these donors provide aid through developed world competition agencies. Our suggestion is that multilateral donor agencies work hard to overcome deficiencies that their organizational structure presents to recipient agencies. Overall, our analysis of technical assistance efforts in one field of complex regulation (antitrust) may prove relevant to policies of how to make assistance more effective across regulatory fields.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: antitrust, law and development, competition policy, development economics, organizations

JEL Classification: K21, L40, L51, O19

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 22, 2008 ; Last revised: November 6, 2008

Suggested Citation

Sokol, D. Daniel and Stiegert, Kyle W., An Empirical Evaluation of Long Term Advisors and Short Term Interventions in Technical Assistance and Capacity Building. U. of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-03 ; College of Europe GCLC Working Paper No. 02/08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1095884 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1095884

Contact Information

D. Daniel Sokol (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )
Spessard L. Holland Law Center
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
(352) 273-0968 (Phone)
(352) 392-3005 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/sokol/
George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center ( email )
200 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052
United States
Kyle W. Stiegert
University of Wisconsin ( email )
427 Lorch St.
Madison, WI 53706-1503
United States
608-217-5836 (Phone)
608-262-4376 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.aae.wisc.edu/fsrg
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,405
Downloads: 225
Download Rank: 74,747
Footnotes:  95

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds