Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1096561
 


 



Sentencing Redux


Craig Bradley


Indiana University Maurer School of Law

2008

Trial Magazine, March 2008
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 100

Abstract:     
This article, to appear in Trial Magazine, discusses the two recent Supreme Court sentencing cases, Gall and Kimbrough. In both cases, the Supreme Court allowed federal trial judges to depart downward from the Sentencing Guidelines, and reversed Court of Appeals decisions that had struck down those departures. In Gall the trial judge had sentenced the defendant to probation, when the recommended prison term in the Guidlelines was 30-37 months. The Court held that an "abuse of discretion" standard must be applied in evaluating the trial court's sentence and that the judge had not abused his discretion here. Kimbrough was to the same effect when the trial court gave the defendant the minimum statutory sentence for possession of crack cocaine. This was significantly below the guidleines range (but still higher than the sentence would have been had the defendant possessed powder cocaine).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Criminal Law, Sentencing, Sentencing Guidelines, Gall, Kimbrough

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 24, 2008 ; Last revised: June 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Craig, Sentencing Redux (2008). Trial Magazine, March 2008; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 100. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1096561

Contact Information

Craig Bradley (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 442
Downloads: 42

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.594 seconds