Reconciling Faith, Reason, and Freedom: Catholicism and Evolution from Scopes to Dover
Christopher M. Hammer
University of Virginia - School of Law, Alumnus or Degree Candidate Author
February 23, 2008
The participants in the Scopes trial presented a dramatic tension between religion and science that tended to highlight a mutual exclusivity between traditional belief in God and adherence to the theory of evolution. The reaction of the nation's Roman Catholics to the trial, underrepresented in previous scholarly accounts, tend to undermine this stark dichotomy between religion and science. This paper traces reactions to the trial published in Catholic periodicals to present their acceptance of the principles underlying each side of the trial - the defense's appeal to human reason and the prosecution's appeal to faith - and their rejection of what they considered to be each side's excesses. These same tensions - deriving from the principle of compatibility between the Catholic faith and scientific observation - were present in the Dover litigation over a school district's promotion of the alternative theory of intelligent design to explain human origins.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: evolution, Catholicism, legal history, Scopes, Kitzmiller v. Dover, science and religion, religious liberty, intelligent design, creationismworking papers series
Date posted: February 24, 2008 ; Last revised: March 2, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds