Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1097402
 


 



The Separateness of Persons and Liberal Theory


Matt Zwolinski


University of San Diego


Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 147-165, June 2008

Abstract:     
The fact that persons are separate in some descriptive sense is relatively uncontroversial. But one of the distinctive ideas of contemporary liberal political philosophy is that the descriptive fact of our separateness is normatively momentous. John Rawls and Robert Nozick both take the separateness of persons to provide a foundation for their rejection of utilitarianism and for their own positive political theories. So why do their respective versions of liberalism look so different? This paper claims that the difference is based in Rawls' and Nozick's differing understandings of the morally significant aspects of personhood, and argues that respect for separateness is a value better suited to defend Nozickian libertarianism than Rawlsian liberalism.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Separateness of Persons, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Liberalism, Libertarianism, Egalitarianism, Respect, Utilitarianism, Contractarianism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 26, 2008 ; Last revised: July 25, 2010

Suggested Citation

Zwolinski, Matt, The Separateness of Persons and Liberal Theory. Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 147-165, June 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1097402

Contact Information

Matt Zwolinski (Contact Author)
University of San Diego ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-4094 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.sandiego.edu/~mzwolinski
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,340
Downloads: 573
Download Rank: 25,113

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.360 seconds