When - and Why - Do Hard Cases Make Bad Law? The GSP Dispute
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
THE WTO AND DEVELOPING NATIONS, G. Bermann, P. Mavroidis, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2007
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-50
Hard cases, Holmes famously declared, make bad law. But what makes a case hard? Do hard cases necessarily generate bad law? What strategies can courts use to minimize the likelihood of generating bad law?
There is widespread agreement that India's challenge to the EC's generalized system of preferences (GSP) presented the WTO's Appellate Body with a hard case. This short essay (i) discusses why conventional legal, economic and policy analysis are of only limited utility in explaining why the GSP case was so difficult, and in evaluating the Appellate Body's decision; (ii) addresses the appropriate role of the Appellate Body in difficult cases; and (iii) advances a rather unconventional explanation for why the GSP dispute was so difficult.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: WTO, GSP, developing states, international tradeAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 26, 2008 ; Last revised: November 4, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.796 seconds