Appreciating Mandatory Rules: A Reply to Critics
University of California Hastings College of the Law
Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 102, p. 228, 2008
In Bowles v. Russell, the Court held that the statutory time limitation for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. In a short essay published in Northwestern University Law Review's Colloquy, I critiqued that decision, suggested a better approach, and previewed some of the difficulties that the decision may cause for the future. Professors Perry Dane and Beth Burch and Mr. King Poor, Esq. responded. This short reply to their responses develops additional reasons for characterizing the time to file a notice of appeal as mandatory but nonjurisdictional.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: Bowles, Colloquy, Poor, Dane, Burch, time to appeal, notice of appeal, jurisdictionality, mandatoryAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 26, 2008 ; Last revised: November 12, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds