Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1097744
 
 

Footnotes (104)



 


 



The Iconic Insider Trading Cases


Stephen M. Bainbridge


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law


UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 08-05

Abstract:     
This essay traces the evolution of insider trading jurisprudence, focusing on the three iconic Supreme Court decisions: Chiarella, Dirks, and O'Hagan. The essay argues that all three cases were seriously flawed because each failed to cohere as to either policy or doctrine. Just as a child might break his toy by attempting to force a square peg into a round hole, the Supreme Court made a hash of insider trading law (and Rule 10b-5 generally) by attempting to force insider trading into a paradigm - securities fraud - that does not fit.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: insider trading

JEL Classification: K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 26, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Bainbridge, Stephen M., The Iconic Insider Trading Cases. UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 08-05. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1097744 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1097744

Contact Information

Stephen Mark Bainbridge (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-1599 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.professorbainbridge.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,027
Downloads: 1,255
Download Rank: 7,612
Footnotes:  104

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds