|
||||
|
||||
Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent LawStephen M. MaurerUniversity of California, Berkeley Suzanne ScotchmerUniversity of California - Department of Economics ; School of Law, University of California, Berkeley; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) 2006 American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 476-522, 2006 Abstract: We address the patent/antitrust conflict in licensing and develop three guiding principles for deciding acceptable terms of license. Profit neutrality holds that patent rewards should not depend on the rightholder's ability to work the patent himself. Derived reward holds that the patentholder's profits should be earned, if at all, from the social value created by the invention. Minimalism holds that licenses should not be more restrictive than necessary to achieve neutrality. We argue that these principles are economically sound and rationalize some key decisions of the twentieth century such as General Electric and Line Material. Accepted Paper Series Date posted: February 29, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.437 seconds