Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1100692
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Catalyzing More Adequate Federal Habeas Review of Summation Misconduct: Persuasion Theory and the Sixth Amendment Right to an Unbiased Jury


Ryan Patrick Alford


Bora Laskin Faculty of Law, Lakehead University


Oklahoma Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 3, Fall 2006

Abstract:     
This article argues that higher scrutiny of claims of argumentative misconduct in prosecutors' closing arguments is warranted in the context of federal habeas review of state criminal trials. The current standard against which these claims are reviewed is unduly convoluted and subjective. Furthermore, habeas review is essential where state courts lack institutional competence to address the misconduct at issue, as the article demonstrates. The proposal is to realign the test for unduly inflammatory summations with the test applied to prejudicial pretrial publicity, as persuasion theory demonstrates that these phenomena have similar effects.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: forensic misconduct, inflammatory summations, closing arguments, sixth amendment, jury trial, persuasion theory, criminal procedure, habeas corpus

JEL Classification: K14, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 7, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Alford, Ryan Patrick, Catalyzing More Adequate Federal Habeas Review of Summation Misconduct: Persuasion Theory and the Sixth Amendment Right to an Unbiased Jury. Oklahoma Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 3, Fall 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1100692

Contact Information

Ryan Patrick Alford (Contact Author)
Bora Laskin Faculty of Law, Lakehead University ( email )
955 Oliver Road
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 348
Downloads: 43
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.390 seconds