|
||||
|
||||
How Do Public Companies Adjust Their Board Structures?David C. CiceroUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville M. Babajide WintokiUniversity of Kansas - School of Business Tina YangVillanova University - School of Business February 10, 2010 Journal of Corporate Finance, Forthcoming Abstract: We show that public companies frequently changed their board structures before implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, with two-thirds of firms changing board size or independence during an average two-year period. Board changes were associated with changes in firm-specific fundamentals, but the rate of change toward predicted structures was negatively associated with the level of CEO influence. Companies changed board structures in either direction as underlying firm fundamentals changed, consistent with the pursuit of economically efficient board structures. However, board changes have become less frequent since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted. We provide some evidence that companies became less likely to decrease board independence when changes in fundamentals suggested they should, which may reflect a loss of economic efficiency.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44 Keywords: board independence, board size, board structure, board reform, corporate governance, regulation, endogeneity, dynamic adjustment JEL Classification: D23, G34, G38, K22, M14 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 9, 2008 ; Last revised: June 13, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds