A Bayesian Approach to Real Options: The Case of Distinguishing between Temporary and Permanent Shocks
Steven R. Grenadier
Stanford Graduate School of Business
MIT Sloan School of Management
April 28, 2010
Journal of Finance, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 1949-1986
AFA 2009 San Francisco Meetings Paper
EFA 2008 Athens Meetings Paper
Traditional real options models demonstrate the importance of the "option to wait" due to uncertainty over future shocks to project cash flows. However, there is often another important source of uncertainty: uncertainty over the permanence of past shocks. Adding Bayesian uncertainty over the permanence of past shocks augments the traditional option to wait with an additional "option to learn." The implied investment behavior differs significantly from that in standard models. For example, investment may occur at a time of stable or decreasing cash flows, respond sluggishly to cash flow shocks, and depend on the timing of project cash flows.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 70
Keywords: irreversible investment, real options, Bayesian updating, learning, temporary and permanent shocks, mean reversion
JEL Classification: D81, D83, G13, G31
Date posted: March 6, 2008 ; Last revised: November 21, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds