|
||||
|
||||
Time Varying Voting Rights and the Private Benefits of ControlAvner KalayTel Aviv University - Faculty of Management; University of Utah - David Eccles School of Business Shagun PantUniversity of Iowa - Department of Finance November 2009 EFA 2008 Athens Meetings Paper Abstract: In the presence of derivative markets, shareholders can choose their desired mix of cash-flows/votes and vary it through time. We find that the optimal security-voting structure is time varying. Even in the presence of derivatives, most of the time, shareholders optimally choose 1S1V. 1S1V turns out to be the socially as well as privately optimal choice for the majority of the life-cycle of the firm. However, when faced with a control contest shareholders optimally deviate from 1S1V. Shareholders use synthetic stocks to change their per vote exposure to cash flows and force the winning team to pay them its entire surplus. This flexibility to deviate from 1S1V when needed increases the market value of the firm. We show that during the control contest, the difference between the price of the stock and the synthetic stock provides a measure of the private benefits of control.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 58 Keywords: corporate governance, regulation, security voting structure, control contests, derivatives JEL Classification: G32, G34 working papers seriesDate posted: March 6, 2008 ; Last revised: February 21, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.610 seconds