Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1103248
 
 

Footnotes (386)



 


 



Judging Journalism: The Turn Toward Privacy and Judicial Regulation of the Press


Amy Gajda


Tulane University - Law School

September 22, 2008

Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 07-20
California Law Review, 2009

Abstract:     
Courts, John Marshall famously declared, must "say what the law is." Increasingly, it seems, they are also called upon to say what the news is. When subjects of unwanted publicity sue for invasion of privacy or other torts, journalists commonly defend on the ground that the challenged disclosures were privileged as newsworthy. Traditionally, courts minimized constitutional concerns by deferring heavily to journalists' own sense of what qualified as news; that a story made the newspapers or the evening news was itself nearly conclusive evidence that the topic was of legitimate public interest and therefore beyond the control of tort law. Recently, however, courts have grown decidedly less tolerant. Driven by mounting anxiety over the loss of personal privacy generally and by declining respect for the press specifically, courts are increasingly willing to impose their own judgments about the proper boundaries of news coverage. Ironically, an emerging tool used by courts to police news outlets is journalists' own codes of professional ethics. By measuring editorial decisions against gauzy internal ethics standards, courts give the appearance of deference to the profession while, in fact, aggressively scrutinizing editorial judgments.

This Article demonstrates the growing threat to press freedom posed by these emerging trends. Part I places the conflict in historical context, showing how evolving legal understandings of privacy and press freedom set the two on course for a modern collision over "newsworthiness," which was resolved initially by deferring to journalists' editorial judgment. Part II explains how recent developments - including growing resort to journalists' codes of professional ethics - have undermined judicial deference to journalism in defining the news. Part III examines the implications of the nascent resurgence of tort regulation of journalism, and Part IV concludes by suggesting ways in which courts and journalists individually might end this narrowing of news.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 86

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 10, 2008 ; Last revised: October 28, 2008

Suggested Citation

Gajda, Amy, Judging Journalism: The Turn Toward Privacy and Judicial Regulation of the Press (September 22, 2008). Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 07-20; California Law Review, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1103248

Contact Information

Amy Gajda (Contact Author)
Tulane University - Law School ( email )
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,044
Downloads: 376
Download Rank: 43,002
Footnotes:  386

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds