Footnotes (85)



Four Free Speech Goals for Trademark Law

William McGeveran

University of Minnesota Law School

Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 18, 2008
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-09

This Essay, prepared for the annual symposium of the Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, sets out goals for preserving free speech within trademark law. In recent years, courts have begun to reach speech-protective results quite consistently in cases that raise such issues. They have not, however, developed unified or coherent doctrine for doing so, and they do not resolve such cases quickly. The resulting confusion of standards and prolonged litigation have a chilling effect on expression using trademarks, just as surely as if judges issued injunctions to prohibit the same speech. In short, procedural structure is at least as important as eventual outcomes. Therefore, in addition to achieving an appropriate substantive balance between economic and expressive objectives of trademark law, we should integrate First Amendment requirements into doctrine, design clearer standards, and facilitate faster and less expensive adjudication. Articulating these four goals sets the stage for upcoming work using them as standards to critique current law and propose reform.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: trademark, "free speech", "First Amendment", "intellectual property"

JEL Classification: O34

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 10, 2008  

Suggested Citation

McGeveran, William, Four Free Speech Goals for Trademark Law. Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 18, 2008; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-09. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1104465

Contact Information

William McGeveran (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
HOME PAGE: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,733
Downloads: 521
Download Rank: 33,556
Footnotes:  85
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.265 seconds