|
||||
|
||||
Does the Market Value Mandated Disclosure?
Robert H. Battalio University of Notre Dame - Department of Finance Tim Loughran University of Notre Dame Brian C. Hatch University of Cincinnati - Department of Finance - Real Estate April 30, 2008 AFA 2009 San Francisco Meetings Paper Abstract: Prior to the passage of the 1964 Securities Acts Amendments, firms moving from the Over-The-Counter (OTC) market to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) subjected themselves to a higher level of disclosure in return for the greater visibility and liquidity made available on the NYSE. Passage of the 1964 Securities Acts Amendments largely eliminated the differences in disclosure requirements in these markets. Prior literature finds that firms experience significant abnormal returns when they announce intentions to list on the NYSE. If investors value mandated disclosure, returns generated by announcing a move from the OTC market to the NYSE should be lower after the passage of the 1964 legislation. We examine the returns for 288 firms announcing intentions to move from the OTC market to the NYSE before and after this legislation, and find no difference in either raw or abnormal announcement period returns. This suggests investors place little value on mandated disclosure.
Keywords: mandated disclosure JEL Classifications: G38 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: March 13, 2008 ; Last revised: May 03, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.156 seconds.