Step Away from the Case Book: A Call for Balance and Integration in Law School Pedagogy
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL), Vol. 43, p. 611, 2008
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-55
This essay is a part of a symposium project by the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review that culls together radical proposals for the reform of legal education. In this essay, I argue that courses in law school should integrate skills training, doctrine and theory so that students learn legal doctrine and theory in a practical context. Integrating skills into doctrinal and theory courses will give students a deeper, richer notion of what it means to practice law and think like a lawyer. In short, law school pedagogy should project a model of law practice that both accurately reflects what lawyers do and that opens students' minds to a vision of lawyering as a creative endeavor that involves critical, outside the box thinking. An integrated approach can potentially improve the quality of law practice, enhance lawyers' experience as practitioners, and possibly even change the law itself.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: pedagogy, legal education, skills training
JEL Classification: K40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 16, 2008 ; Last revised: December 10, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds