Costly Screens and Patent Examination
Jonathan S. Masur
University of Chicago - Law School
July 1, 2008
The Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 2, Winter 2011
U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 393
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 205
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has acquired a well-deserved reputation for inefficacy and inefficiency. Proposals for reforming the patent office have thus focused on improving the quality of patent review while decreasing its cost. Yet this view overlooks the valuable function performed by the high costs associated with obtaining a patent: these costs serve as an effective screen against low-value patents. Moreover, due to asymmetries in patent values, the costly screen is likely to select against socially harmful patents in disproportionate numbers. Although the patent office is the most prominent forum in which this type of costly screening operates, it is not the only one. In a variety of other contexts, the private costs of navigating an administrative process may complement the process itself in screening out unwanted participants.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: patent, PTO, examination, administrative, procedure, costly screen, costly signal, environmental permitting, immigration, landlord, tenant
Date posted: March 12, 2008 ; Last revised: February 24, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds