Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105425
 


 



A New Direction for Shareholder Environmental Activism: The Aftermath Caremark


Geoffrey Christopher Rapp


University of Toledo College of Law


William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2006

Abstract:     
Traditionally, shareholders seeking to encourage more environmentally-friendly corporate governance have pursued one of two strategies. First, some shareholders have sought to nominate environmentally-sensitive directors to corporate boards. Second, shareholders have initiated shareholder resolutions regarding environmental practices. In some limited sense, these efforts have had positive results, raising environmental awareness in the corporate governance community. However, from a purely tactical legal perspective, they have faced severe impediments. Existing corporate law disfavors insurgent board candidates in director elections; and even where successfully elected, an environmentally friendly director may be unable to alter corporate policy due to board structures preventing wholesale change in a single election cycle (such as staggered boards) or fiduciary obligations which bar directors from serving special interests exclusively. Similarly, shareholder resolutions concerning environmental protection are often excludable from a corporation's definitive proxy solicitation as ordinary business or beyond the power of the corporation to effectuate under applicable SEC rules. Even where a shareholder resolution is included in a corporation's proxy solicitation, or where a resolution's proponents bear the cost of financing a proxy campaign on their own, such resolutions are rarely adopted and may have limited practical effect.

This Essay, a contribution to a Corporate Governance and Environmental Best Practices Symposium held at William & Mary in February 2006, attempted to flesh out an alternative strategy for environmental activists based on the Delaware Chancery Court's decision in Caremark. The Article details the legal burdens, benefits, and strategies available to environmental activists in a post-Caremark setting.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Caremark, Fiduciary Duty, Environmental Protection, Corporate Responsibility

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 13, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Rapp, Geoffrey Christopher, A New Direction for Shareholder Environmental Activism: The Aftermath Caremark. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105425

Contact Information

Geoffrey Christopher Rapp (Contact Author)
University of Toledo College of Law ( email )
2801 W. Bancroft Street
Toledo, OH 43606
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 448
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 200,791

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.203 seconds