Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1106363
 
 

Footnotes (439)



 


 



Privacy and Funeral Protests


Christina E. Wells


University of Missouri School of Law

December 8, 2008

North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 151, 2008
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-06

Abstract:     
This Article examines the free speech implications of funeral protest statutes. Enacted in response to the Westboro Baptist Church, whose members protest at funerals to spread their antigay message, such statutes restrict a broad array of peaceful expressive activity. This Article focuses on the states’ interest underlying these statutes - protecting mourners’ right to be free from unwanted intrusions while at funeral services. Few would argue against protecting funeral services from intrusive protests. These statutes, however, go far beyond that notion and protect mourners from offensive, rather than intrusive, protests. As such, they do not conceive of privacy as protection from intrusion. Rather, they conceive of privacy as protecting human dignity from breaches of civility. American law does not traditionally recognize this conception of privacy. How then do such statutes come to rely on it? To some extent, the fault lies with the Supreme Court’s free speech jurisprudence, which has been somewhat unclear regarding the nature of the privacy interest it weighs against free speech rights. Although a careful read of the Court’s cases shows that it rejects an interpretation of privacy as protecting against breaches of civility, its jurisprudence sends mixed signals. Lower courts hearing challenges to funeral protest statutes have misread the Court’s jurisprudence and have recognized a privacy right to be free from offensive messages while attending funerals. If allowed to stand, these decisions will work a dramatic change in the Court’s doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 84

Keywords: funeral protest, funeral picketing, privacy, captive audience, Phelps, free speech, first amendment, constitutional law

JEL Classification: K10, K30

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 16, 2008 ; Last revised: May 6, 2009

Suggested Citation

Wells, Christina E., Privacy and Funeral Protests (December 8, 2008). North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 151, 2008; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1106363

Contact Information

Christina E. Wells (Contact Author)
University of Missouri School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,891
Downloads: 333
Download Rank: 48,221
Footnotes:  439

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.422 seconds