Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1106483
 
 

Footnotes (411)



 


 



Perceptual Segregation


Russell K. Robinson


University of California, Berkeley


Columbia Law Review, Vol. 108, 2008
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 08-10

Abstract:     
This Article argues that outsiders and insiders tend to perceive allegations of discrimination through fundamentally different psychological frameworks. These previously unrecognized differences have profound legal consequences. A workplace may be spatially integrated and yet employees who work side by side may perceive an allegation of discrimination through very different lenses because of their disparate racial and gender identities. Most implicit bias legal scholarship has focused on the cognitive processes of insiders (whites and men) in assessing and evaluating outsiders (people of color and women). This Article opens a new field of legal scholarship, and complements the implicit bias literature, by drawing on empirical studies to explicate the cognitive processes of outsiders in interpreting potential incidents of discrimination. Studies show that blacks and whites are likely to differ substantially in how they conceive of and define discrimination. White people tend to believe that widespread expressions of a commitment to racial equality and the reduction in overt expressions of racist attitudes reflect reductions in racism, whereas black people tend to believe that racist attitudes and behaviors have simply become more difficult to detect. While many whites expect evidence of discrimination to be explicit, and assume that people are colorblind when such evidence is lacking, many blacks perceive bias to be prevalent and primarily implicit. Studies have also revealed that men and women differ significantly in assessing incidents of sexual harassment. Differences in perception have profound implications for how our judicial machinery, which consists predominantly of white male judges, resolves antidiscrimination claims. Judges are likely to impose their own contingent conceptions of discrimination, with little or no awareness of the perceptual limitations shaping their judgments. This Article explores reforms in the judicial system and in workplaces that could help sensitize both insiders and outsiders to the other perspective and break down the rigidity in these clashing mindsets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 90

Keywords: discrimination, perception of discrimination, racial bias, implicit bias literature, judicial conceptions of discrimination, judicial reform

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 17, 2008 ; Last revised: March 21, 2008

Suggested Citation

Robinson, Russell K., Perceptual Segregation. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 108, 2008; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 08-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1106483

Contact Information

Russell K. Robinson (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley ( email )
310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
510-642-3932 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,233
Downloads: 315
Download Rank: 53,250
Footnotes:  411

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.235 seconds