Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1107074
 
 

References (28)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Asset Sales, Recourse, and Investor Reactions to Initial Securitizations: Evidence Why Off-balance Sheet Accounting Treatment Does not Remove On-balance Sheet Financial Risk


Joseph R. Mason


Louisiana State University - Ourso School of Business; University of Pennsylvania - Wharton Financial Institutions Center

Eric James Higgins


Kansas State University - College of Business Administration

Adi Mordel


Drexel University - Bennett S. LeBow College of Business

May 22, 2009


Abstract:     
Both accounting and regulatory treatments classify securitizations as a “sale” of assets, therefore allowing the issuer to remove the assets from their books. This “off-balance sheet” treatment relies crucially on the concept of “true” sale. The concept most diametrically opposed from a true sale is a “financing.” In a financing, assets do not leave the firm’s books, so the transaction is exclusively “on-balance sheet.” The present paper presents conjectural evidence of recourse activity and bankruptcy seizure that undermine the fundamental concept of true sale. The paper then analyzes investor reactions to firms’ first securitization announcements, demonstrating negative short-term equity returns and negative long-term operating performance following initial securitizations. Such reactions constitute evidence that securitizations are more similar to financings than asset sales. Additional analysis shows that securitization is also associated with increased systematic risk, suggesting that the rapid growth fueled by securitization is similar to increasing leverage. The effect is more pronounced for banks than non-banks, suggesting that there is substantial value to regulatory capital arbitrage in addition to accounting arbitrage.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Bank Regulation, Securitization, Off-balance Sheet, Recourse, Bankruptcy-remote

JEL Classification: G21, G23, G28

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 22, 2009 ; Last revised: October 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Mason, Joseph R. and Higgins, Eric James and Mordel, Adi, Asset Sales, Recourse, and Investor Reactions to Initial Securitizations: Evidence Why Off-balance Sheet Accounting Treatment Does not Remove On-balance Sheet Financial Risk (May 22, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1107074 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107074

Contact Information

Joseph R. Mason (Contact Author)
Louisiana State University - Ourso School of Business
2900 Business Education Complex
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
United States
202-683-8909 (Phone)
University of Pennsylvania - Wharton Financial Institutions Center ( email )
3641 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218
United States
Eric James Higgins
Kansas State University - College of Business Administration ( email )
117 D Calvin Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506
United States
(785)-532-3936 (Phone)
Adi Mordel
Drexel University - Bennett S. LeBow College of Business ( email )
215-622-8695 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,614
Downloads: 435
Download Rank: 36,322
References:  28
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds