|
||||
|
||||
Are All Inside Directors the Same? Evidence from the External Directorship Market.Ronald W. MasulisUniversity of New South Wales - Australian School of Business; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Financial Research Network (FIRN) H. Shawn MobbsUniversity of Alabama October 12, 2010 Journal of Finance, Forthcoming ECGI - Finance Working Paper No. 241/2009 3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Papers AFA 2009 San Francisco Meetings Paper Abstract: Agency theory and optimal contracting theory posit opposing roles and shareholder wealth effects for corporate inside directors. We evaluate these competing theories using the labor market for outside directorships to differentiate inside directors. Firms with inside directors holding outside directorships have better operating performance and market-to-book ratios, especially when board monitoring is more difficult. These boards make better acquisition decisions, have greater cash-holdings and overstate earnings less often. Announcements of outside board appointments improve shareholder wealth, while departure announcements reduce it, consistent with these inside directors improving board performance and outside directorships being an important source of inside director incentives.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 90 Keywords: board of directors, inside directors, independent directors, corporate governance, manager entrenchment JEL Classification: G34, D23 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 22, 2008 ; Last revised: September 4, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.438 seconds