Katherine Y. Barnes
University of Arizona Rogers College of Law
March 18, 2008
Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 08-04
This piece reviews Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age by Bernard E. Harcourt. In this provocative and innovative book, Harcourt argues that prediction has serious flaws and, more importantly, warps society's view of justice by focusing solely on justice that is quantifiable. The book review first outlines Harcourt's three criticisms against prediction and discusses how these criticisms interrelate. These criticisms demonstrate that it is not prediction that Harcourt is against; rather, it is human judgment, and the danger inherent in flawed people making crucial decisions in the criminal justice system. The book review concludes, as does Against Prediction, with a discussion of using randomization in the criminal justice system, and provides an alternative to Harcourt's draconian decision to eliminate prediction.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: criminal justice, empirical methods, racial profiling, predictionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 20, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.844 seconds