Not So Lucky Any More: CEO Compensation in Financially Distressed Firms
Florida International University (FIU) - Department of Finance
Oscar A. Mitnik
University of Miami; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
AFA 2009 San Francisco Meetings Paper
There is a debate on whether executive pay reflects rent extraction due to "managerial power" or is the result of arms-length bargaining in a principal-agent framework. In this paper we offer a test of the managerial power hypothesis by empirically examining the CEO compensation of U.S. public companies that were ever in financial distress between 1992 and 2005. Using a bias-corrected matching estimator that estimates the causal effects of financial distress, we find that, for the distressed firms, CEO turnover rates increase markedly and their CEOs, both incumbents and successors, experience significant reductions in total compensation. The bulk of the reduction in total compensation derives from the decline in value of stock option grants, which we argue is due to a change in the opportunistic timing of option grants. We define "lucky" grants as those with grant prices below or at the lowest stock price of the grant month, and we find that the proportion of lucky grants for financially distressed firms is higher before insolvency and lower upon and after insolvency, while the proportion for similar but solvent firms remains stable throughout the period. We interpret this evidence as consistent with a decrease in managerial power induced by a tightening in the "outrage" constraint due to the episode of financial distress.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: CEO compensation, CEO turnover, financial distress, lucky grants, bias-corrected matching estimators
JEL Classification: G30, J33, M52working papers series
Date posted: March 20, 2008 ; Last revised: February 15, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.515 seconds