Abstract

 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (113)



 


 



The Role of Precedent in Constitutional Adjudication: An Introspection


David L. Shapiro


Harvard Law School


Texas Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 5, 2008
Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 08-08

Abstract:     
Much scholarly interest in recent years has centered on the proper role of precedent in constitutional adjudication, especially in the Supreme Court. This essay seeks to contribute to this lively and important debate, first, by summarizing (and categorizing) the principal approaches to the issue that have been advanced by scholars and judges, second, by explaining and defending my own position, and, finally, by testing that position in the context of an especially difficult problem. In the process, the essay seeks to cast light on some broader questions about the role of theory in the judicial process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Constitutional law, Constitutional adjudication, Precedent, Stare decisis

JEL Classification: K19, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 20, 2008 ; Last revised: March 25, 2008

Suggested Citation

Shapiro, David L., The Role of Precedent in Constitutional Adjudication: An Introspection. Texas Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 5, 2008; Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 08-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1108440

Contact Information

David L. Shapiro (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-4618 (Phone)
617-496-4880 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,268
Downloads: 562
Download Rank: 21,828
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  113

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.594 seconds