Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1108443
 
 

Footnotes (788)



 


 



The Revolutionary American Jury: A Case Study of the 1778-1779 Philadelphia Treason Trials


Carlton F. W. Larson


University of California, Davis - School of Law

March 18, 2008

Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, Fall 2008
UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper

Abstract:     
Between September 1778 and April 1779, twenty-three men were tried in Philadelphia for high treason against the state of Pennsylvania. These trials were aggressively prosecuted by the state in an atmosphere of widespread popular hostility to opponents of the American Revolution. Philadelphia juries, however, convicted only four of these men, a low conviction rate even in an age of widespread jury lenity; moreover, in three of these four cases, the juries petitioned Pennsylvania's executive authority for clemency. Since it is unlikely that most of the defendants were factually innocent, these low conviction rates are a mystery that has never been adequately explained.

This Article offers such an explanation, and, in the process, uses these trials as a case study of jury service in late eighteenth-century America. We know surprisingly little about this important subject, as legal historians have focused almost exclusively on the more visible role of judges. Drawing on a wide variety of sources, this Article seeks to remedy this imbalance by providing the most thorough study yet written of a group of eighteenth-century American jurors.

The Article demonstrates, for the first time, how eighteenth-century American defense counsel creatively used peremptory challenges, deployed along religious, political, and economic lines, to create favorable juries, composed almost entirely of men who had previously served in treason cases. Through careful study of demographic records, this Article reconstructs the Philadelphia jury box and allows us to identify not only the social status of the jurors, but also the intricate network of connections linking the grand jurors, the trial jurors, and the defendants. It explains how Philadelphia jurors repeatedly balked at the death penalty, effectively nullifying Pennsylvania's capital law of treason. It also examines the subsequent attacks on jury independence triggered by these acquittals, ranging from strident newspaper criticism to a deadly militia attack on the home of James Wilson, signatory to the Declaration of Independence and defense counsel in many of the treason trials. By examining the actions of juries in a convulsive, violent civil war, the Article also illuminates the jury's historical role in balancing liberty and national security, an issue that continues to confront America today.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 85

Keywords: legal history, jury, treason, Pennsylvania, American Revolution.

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 20, 2008 ; Last revised: February 6, 2009

Suggested Citation

Larson, Carlton F. W., The Revolutionary American Jury: A Case Study of the 1778-1779 Philadelphia Treason Trials (March 18, 2008). Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, Fall 2008; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1108443

Contact Information

Carlton F. W. Larson (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,164
Downloads: 322
Download Rank: 52,081
Footnotes:  788

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds