|
||||
|
||||
Post-Merger Restructuring and the Boundaries of the FirmVojislav MaksimovicUniversity of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business Gordon M. PhillipsUniversity of Southern California; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Nagpurnanand R. PrabhalaUniversity of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business March 18, 2008 AFA 2009 San Francisco Meetings Paper Abstract: Mergers and acquisitions are a fast way for a firm to acquire assets. Using plant-level data, we examine how firms redraw their boundaries after acquisitions. We find that there is a surprisingly substantial amount of restructuring in a short period after mergers are consummated. Acquirers sell 27% and close 19% of acquired plants within three years after completing an acquisition. Plants that belong to the target's peripheral divisions, especially in industries in which asset values are increasing and in industries in which the acquirer does not have a comparative advantage, are more likely to be sold by the purchasing firm. Acquirers who exhibit skill in running their peripheral businesses tend to retain acquired plants. Plants retained by acquirers increase in productivity whereas sold plants do not. The extent of post-merger restructuring activities and their cross-sectional variation do not support an empire building explanation for mergers. Acquirers readjust their firm boundaries in ways that are consistent with the exploitation of their comparative advantage across industries.
Keywords: Mergers, Acquisitions, Restructuring, Selloffs, Theory of the Firm JEL Classification: G30, G31, G32, G34 working papers seriesDate posted: March 20, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.703 seconds