|
||||
|
||||
Empty Voting and the Efficiency of Corporate GovernanceAlon P. BravDuke University - Fuqua School of Business Richmond D. MathewsUniversity of Maryland - Department of Finance February 3, 2010 AFA 2009 San Francisco Meetings Paper Abstract: We model corporate voting outcomes when an informed trader, such as a hedge fund, can establish separate positions in a firm’s shares and votes (“empty voting”). The positions are separated by borrowing shares on the record date, hedging economic exposure, or trading between record and voting dates. We find that the trader’s presence can improve efficiency overall despite the fact that it sometimes ends up selling to a net short position and then voting to decrease firm value. An efficiency improvement is likely if other shareholders’ votes are not highly correlated with the correct decision or if it is relatively expensive to separate votes from shares on the record date. On the other hand, empty voting will tend to decrease efficiency if it is relatively inexpensive to separate votes from shares and other shareholders are likely to vote the right way.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52 Keywords: voting, trading, hedge funds, corporate governance JEL Classification: G34 working papers seriesDate posted: March 25, 2008 ; Last revised: March 27, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.453 seconds