Empty Voting and the Efficiency of Corporate Governance
Duke University - Fuqua School of Business
Richmond D. Mathews
University of Maryland - Department of Finance
February 3, 2010
AFA 2009 San Francisco Meetings Paper
We model corporate voting outcomes when an informed trader, such as a hedge fund, can establish separate positions in a firm’s shares and votes (“empty voting”). The positions are separated by borrowing shares on the record date, hedging economic exposure, or trading between record and voting dates. We find that the trader’s presence can improve efficiency overall despite the fact that it sometimes ends up selling to a net short position and then voting to decrease firm value. An efficiency improvement is likely if other shareholders’ votes are not highly correlated with the correct decision or if it is relatively expensive to separate votes from shares on the record date. On the other hand, empty voting will tend to decrease efficiency if it is relatively inexpensive to separate votes from shares and other shareholders are likely to vote the right way.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: voting, trading, hedge funds, corporate governance
JEL Classification: G34
Date posted: March 25, 2008 ; Last revised: March 27, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.218 seconds