Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1108731
 
 

References (43)



 
 

Citations (24)



 


 



Information Content of Insider Trades Before and After the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


Francois Brochet


Boston University - Department of Accounting

October 2009

Accounting Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This paper examines the information content of Form 4 filings under the more timely disclosure regime introduced by Section 403 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Abnormal returns and trading volumes around filings of insider stock purchases are significantly greater after SOX than before. Abnormal trading volumes around filings of insider sales are also greater post-SOX on average, but stock returns are not more negative. However, once controlling for pre-planned transactions, reporting lag, litigation risk, and news following insider trades, I also find a negative association between returns around filings of insider sales and SOX. Overall, the evidence suggests that the prompt public disclosures about insider transactions mandated by the new rule are relevant to the pricing of securities. The results are also consistent with SOX and regulatory actions reducing the incentives to sell ahead of privately known negative news.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: insider trading, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, information content

JEL Classification: G14, K22, M41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 21, 2008 ; Last revised: October 25, 2009

Suggested Citation

Brochet, Francois, Information Content of Insider Trades Before and After the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (October 2009). Accounting Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1108731 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1108731

Contact Information

Francois Brochet (Contact Author)
Boston University - Department of Accounting ( email )
595 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,347
Downloads: 973
Download Rank: 12,211
References:  43
Citations:  24
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.562 seconds