Reclaiming Egalitarianism in the Political Theory of Campaign Finance Reform
Frank A. Pasquale III
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project
University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2008, No. 2, 2008
Seton Hall Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 1111566
Recent advocacy for campaign finance reform has been based on an ideal of the democratic process which is unrealistic and unhelpful. Scholars should instead return to its egalitarian roots. This article examines how deliberative democratic theory became the main justification for campaign finance reform. It exposes the shortcomings of this deliberativist detour and instead models campaign spending as an effort to commodify issue-salience. Given this dominant function of money in politics, a more effective paradigm for reform is equalizing influence. Advocates of campaign regulation should return to the original principles of reformers; not an idealized vision of the democratic process, but pragmatic concerns about moneyed interests acquiring too much influence over the nation's politics.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 62
Keywords: campaign finance, egalitarianism, political theory, Rawls, deliberative democracy, politicsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 20, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds