SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 



'Ideology in' vs. 'Cultural Cognition of' Law: What Difference Does it Make?

Dan M. Kahan
Yale University - Law School


March 20, 2008

Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 08-22
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 180

Abstract:     
Recent scholarship in law and political science identifies ideology as a major determinant of judicial decisionmaking. This essay suggests the possibility that much if not all the evidence this work rests on might be attributed to the influence of cultural cognition, a set of mechanisms that motivate individuals to conform their factual perceptions to their values. Such an account has the potential to furnish a psychologically richer description of how competing values generate judicial dissensus, a more informed normative appraisal of such dissensus, and a more tractable set of prescriptions for reducing it.

Keywords: cultural cognition, ideology, judicial decisionmaking

Working Paper Series

Date posted: March 25, 2008 ; Last revised: February 03, 2009

Suggested Citation

Kahan, Dan M., 'Ideology in' vs. 'Cultural Cognition of' Law: What Difference Does it Make? (March 20, 2008). Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 08-22; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 180. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1111865


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Dan M. Kahan (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
HOME PAGE: http://research.yale.edu/culturalcognition/kahan
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,001
Downloads: 391
Download Rank: 20,900

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.157 seconds.