|
||||
|
||||
Chapter 6: Modularity and the "Heuristics and Biases" Research ProgramAlexander J. FieldSanta Clara University - Leavey School of Business - Economics Department Altruistically Inclined, pp. 273-294, 2001 Abstract: Much of economic theory has been guided by a methodology that, in its more enthusiastic moments, seems to glorify the irrelevance of empirical research on how people actually behave (see, e.g, Selten, 1998). In this light it is not surprising that with one or two important exceptions, economists' knowledge of or interest in experimental methods historically has been limited. In recent years, multidisciplinary participation in experiments using human subjects has begun to change this, and has been associated with an increased willingness to use these methods and consider the implications of what they show. As Selten's comments indicate, these results are now, in the area of strategic interaction, so broad and so consistent in their identification of deficiencies in the predictions of standard models that a number of theorists have found it desirable to rethink what explanatory or predictive claims are actually made for normative theory.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26 Keywords: Altruism, Game Theory, Behavioral Economics, Evolutionary Theory JEL Classification: B41, C71, D64 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 25, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.625 seconds