Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1113894
 


 



Atomism and the Private Merger Challenge


Paul J. Stancil


Brigham Young University, J. Reuben Clark Law School

2005

Temple Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2005
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 07-23

Abstract:     
This Article explores the implications of allowing private parties to challenge mergers and acquisitions under the antitrust laws. It highlights a number of relatively recent developments in antitrust law that suggest an increase in private merger challenges in the future, and it identifies antiquated time of suit doctrines that may lead to inefficient and/or frivolous antimerger filings. It concludes by proposing several significant changes to the existing legal regime: (1) limited fee-shifting; (2) rigid time-of-suit deadlines; (3) single damages; and (4) limits on the use of postacquisition evidence to establish liability. Taken together, these reforms will allow private parties to vindicate the public interest without substantial risk of abuse or inefficient results.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 78


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Stancil, Paul J., Atomism and the Private Merger Challenge (2005). Temple Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2005; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 07-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1113894

Contact Information

Paul J. Stancil (Contact Author)
Brigham Young University, J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )
430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 562
Downloads: 48

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.641 seconds