Foreword: On the Judicial Safeguards of Federalism
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, 2008
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-63
This short essay, written as an introduction to a symposium on federalism, asks whether there is a judicially enforceable constitutional boundary of exclusive state authority beyond which Congress cannot reach and whether there are areas of state autonomy that may be judicially implied from the nature of our federal system. While the modern Supreme Court's answer to these questions is clearly yes, this essay argues that the text and structure of the Constitution establish that there are no judicially enforceable limits on Congressional power in the cause of federalism, beyond those in the literal text of the Constitution.
I do not rely on the political safeguards of federalism. The Framers did provide the States with three important powers to influence the composition and functioning of the federal government - the powers to select Senators, determine the qualifications for voting for Representatives, and determine the method for selecting Presidential electors. But through a wave of constitutional amendments and collective political action, the citizens of the United States have eliminated or practically nullified these state powers. In consequence, the States today constitute one special interest group out of many.
The nullification of these constitutional prerogatives that the States once enjoyed argues against implying judicially enforceable states' rights. States' rights federalism may have been necessary in a fragmented country, with an embryonic national identity, where the people of one region were ignorant and suspicious of the people of the others. But as our common national identity took shape, and the bonds of the nation subsumed parochial interests, states' rights federalism became an anachronism. The Constitution does continue to contain several explicit rights in the States that must be honored, but there is no warrant for the Supreme Court to reinstate what has been removed, by creating implied spheres of exclusive state autonomy. In short, it is time to acknowledge what the Constitution, viewed as a whole, now makes clear - that the United States has plenary sovereign powers over the several States.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: exclusive state authority, state autonomy, plenary Congressional power, political safeguards of federalism, states rights, federalism
JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K39
Date posted: March 31, 2008 ; Last revised: April 16, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.156 seconds