Abstract

 
 

References (41)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending


Craig R. Everett


Pepperdine University - Graziadio School of Business and Management

March 15, 2010


Abstract:     
This paper investigates default risk for online social lending markets based on group membership. Online social lending refers to loan auction websites where individuals lend money to other individuals. Being a member of a social lending group within an online lending community is associated with significantly decreased default risk only if membership holds the possibility of real-life personal connections. Loans for non-group borrowers appear to behave like arm’s-length transactions, whereas loans for group borrowers have characteristics similar to relationship banking. The effect of private soft information on the interest rate of group loans is isolated and shown to be significant via orthogonalization of the public credit score and a proxy for the private credit score known only within the group.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Relationship Banking, Group Banking, Default Risk, Social Lending, Peer-to-Peer Lending, Venture Capital, Social Connections, Credit, Internet, Microfinance

JEL Classification: G21, G24, L14, O33, D19, D82

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 31, 2008 ; Last revised: September 7, 2012

Suggested Citation

Everett, Craig R., Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending (March 15, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1114428 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1114428

Contact Information

Craig R. Everett (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University - Graziadio School of Business and Management ( email )
CA
United States
HOME PAGE: http://bschool.pepperdine.edu/faculty/default.php?faculty=craig_everett
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,644
Downloads: 808
Download Rank: 12,950
References:  41
Citations:  3
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.531 seconds