Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1115019
 


 



Partnership Exit Strategies and the Failure of the Substantiality Test


Thomas W. Henning


Loyola Law School Los Angeles - Adjunct

December 30, 2010

Tax Lawyer, Vol. 63, No. 1, Spring 2010

Abstract:     
The article considers partially taxable dispositions of partnership property with a special allocation of taxable gain to the partner receving the corresponding proceeds. Reviewing the history and purpose of the substantial economic effect standard from the 1954 Code through the 1976 Tax Reform Act demonstrates that Congress did not intend that the "substantial" requirement become a rigid quasi-mathematical test that fails to block a number of tax avoidance shemes while disallowing allocations which have no tax avoidance intent. The 2008 amendment of the regulations only exacerbates the deficiencies of the substantiality rules. In conclusion, the regulations governing partnership allocations should be rewritten to include a tax avoidance and business purpose test.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: partnership allocation, substantial economic effect, substantiality, disposition, exchange

JEL Classification: H25

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 3, 2008 ; Last revised: January 2, 2011

Suggested Citation

Henning, Thomas W., Partnership Exit Strategies and the Failure of the Substantiality Test (December 30, 2010). Tax Lawyer, Vol. 63, No. 1, Spring 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1115019

Contact Information

Thomas W. Henning (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles - Adjunct ( email )
Los Angeles, CA
United States
213 622-5555 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,293
Downloads: 260
Download Rank: 66,529
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds