Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1116181
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



A Note on Competing Merger Simulation Models in Antitrust Cases: Can the Best Be Identified?


Oliver Budzinski


Ilmenau University of Technology

May 2008

University of Marburg Economic Paper No. 2008-01

Abstract:     
Advanced economic instruments like simulation models are enjoying an increased popularity in practical antitrust. There is hope that they - being quantitative predictive economic evidence - can substitute for qualitative structural analysis and lead to unambiguous results. This paper demonstrates that it can be theoretically impossible to identify the most appropriate simulation model for any given merger proposal. Due to the inevitable necessity to reduce real-world complexity and multi-parameter character of merger cases, the comparative fit of proposed merger simulation models with mutually incompatible predictions can be the same. This is valid even if an ideal antitrust procedure is assumed. This insight is important regarding two aspects. First, the scope for partisan economic evidence cannot be completely eroded in merger control. Second, simulation cannot eliminate or substitute for qualitative reasoning and economically informed common sense.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: merger simulation, merger control, antitrust, economic evidence

JEL Classification: L40, C15, K21, A11

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 7, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Budzinski, Oliver, A Note on Competing Merger Simulation Models in Antitrust Cases: Can the Best Be Identified? (May 2008). University of Marburg Economic Paper No. 2008-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1116181 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1116181

Contact Information

Oliver Budzinski (Contact Author)
Ilmenau University of Technology ( email )
Ilmenau, D-98684
Germany
HOME PAGE: http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/wth
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,021
Downloads: 361
Download Rank: 46,099
Citations:  2
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.453 seconds