A Critique of Ayn Rand's Theory of Intellectual Property Rights
Pacific Legal Foundation
Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 139-161, Fall 2007
Ayn Rand viewed copyrights and patents as natural rights that were secured by legislation, rather than as monopoly privileges that were created by the state. Other Objectivist writers have followed suit. This article disputes this thesis on the grounds that it fails to recognize the distinction between the right to use and the right to exclude, the latter of which cannot be justified with regard to intellectual property on Objectivist premises. In addition, the article discusses three significant objections to the natural-rights interpretation of copyright that Objectivist authors have failed so far adequately to address.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: Ayn Rand, Objectivism, copyright, natural right copyright, patent, labor theory natural copyright, Adam Mossoff, Eric DanielsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 8, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds