Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1118807
 
 

Footnotes (58)



 


 



The Michigan Supreme Court Diminishes the Right to Trial by Jury in Civil Cases


Robert A. Sedler


Wayne State University Law School

April 10, 2008

Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 08-13

Abstract:     
In this paper, I have analyzed the right to trial by jury in civil cases as reflected in decisions of the Michigan Supreme Court over approximately a 20 year period dealing with three areas affecting the right to trial by jury in civil cases: (1) entitlement to a jury trial; (2) summary disposition; and (3) directed verdicts. The study was constructed to cover cases over a substantial period of time, so that it would be possible to analyze whether the changing composition of the Michigan Supreme Court, beginning in the late 1990's, impacted on the Court's decisions in these three areas.

The conclusion that emerges from the is that the Court, as currently constituted, has diminished the right to trial by jury in civil cases in Michigan. The Court is more inclined than it was prior to 1999 to hold in more cases that there is no genuine issue of material fact, justifying summary disposition, and has now heard cases in which it has held that the defendant is entitled to a directed verdict. And the fact that the Court is more inclined to uphold the granting of summary disposition and directed verdicts is likely to have a demonstrable impact on these kinds cases when they are presented to the Court of Appeals and the trial courts. These courts, following the precedents of the Supreme Court and the results of the cases coming before that Court, will be more likely to rule in favor of granting motions for summary disposition and motions for directed verdicts.

Given the Court's view of the diminished role of the jury in resolving factual disputes in civil cases, litigating lawyers must make the best of a bad situation and do everything that they can in order to protect the right to trial by jury in civil cases. They must try to ensure in the early stages of the litigation that their cases are strong enough to survive a motion for summary disposition and get to the jury, and at the trial they must make a determined effort to present sufficient evidence to survive a directed verdict. Hopefully the Court's view of the diminished role of the jury will not have dealt a fatal blow to the right to trial by jury in civil cases in Michigan. Time will tell how well the lawyers of Michigan have succeeded in preserving this fundamental constitutional right.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 14, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Sedler, Robert A., The Michigan Supreme Court Diminishes the Right to Trial by Jury in Civil Cases (April 10, 2008). Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 08-13. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1118807 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1118807

Contact Information

Robert A. Sedler (Contact Author)
Wayne State University Law School ( email )
471 Palmer
Detroit, MI 48202
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,341
Downloads: 126
Download Rank: 133,068
Footnotes:  58

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds